Experimental vs. Theoretical Probability
Calculate what should happen, then flip a coin and see what actually does — and watch the gap between them shrink the more you flip.
Two ways to think about chance
Flip a coin, roll a die, spin a spinner — there are two different ways to talk about how likely an outcome is. One is to reason it out in advance, using logic about equally likely outcomes. The other is to actually try it a bunch of times and see what happens. They usually agree — but not always exactly, and understanding why is the point of this lesson.
Experimental probability: measured from data
Experimental probability instead comes from actually running trials — flipping the coin, rolling the die, spinning the spinner — and counting how often the event actually happened out of the total number of trials.
- There are 2 equally likely outcomes: heads and tails.
- Exactly 1 of those outcomes (heads) is favorable.
- P(heads) = 1 ÷ 2.
- Experimental probability = number of heads ÷ total flips = 12 ÷ 20.
- Simplify: 12/20 = 3/5 = 0.6.
- Compare to the theoretical probability of 1/2 = 0.5.
Check your understanding
- Theoretical probability is reasoned out in advance: favorable outcomes over total equally likely outcomes.
- Experimental probability is measured from actual trials: how often an event happened over the total number of trials.
- With few trials, experimental probability can differ noticeably from theoretical probability, just by chance.
- As the number of trials grows, experimental probability tends to settle closer to the theoretical value.
- A short unusual streak, like several heads in a row, does not by itself mean a coin or die is unfair.
🎓 Go deeper: external courses & trusted references
External sites are listed for reference only. This course is independent and has no affiliation with, or endorsement from, the institutions named.