Lockheed Martin Assessment & Interview Preparation
Technical Assessments, STAR Panel Interviews & LEO Scheduling
Pakkeprisene nedenfor er i amerikanske dollar (USD). Disse handlekurvlenkene går til den engelske betalingssiden, der du betaler i USD. Øvingsoppgavene og de fleste kursene er på engelsk.
Land guiden gjelder: United States · Aerospace / Defense / Engineering
Ansettelsesprosessen kan variere med land, stilling, avdeling og år.
Lockheed Martin's hiring process is highly structured, emphasising technical validation, behavioral consistency, and integrity. Advancing candidates are contacted by LEO, a virtual scheduling assistant. The core of the process is STAR-based panel interviews, with technical assessments for engineering roles.
Ansettelsesprosessen
-
1Online Application Oppgitt av arbeidsgiverenSubmit application through lockheedmartin.com/careers→ Tailor resume to role requirements; highlight mission-aligned experience
-
2Resume Screening Oppgitt av arbeidsgiverenAutomated and human screening of applications→ Ensure resume clearly matches posted requirements
-
3LEO Scheduling Oppgitt av arbeidsgiverenLEO virtual scheduling assistant contacts candidates (often via @paradox.ai email) to schedule interviews→ Respond promptly to LEO; select available interview slots
-
4Technical Assessment Ofte omtaltOnline coding challenges or technical assessments for engineering and software roles→ Practise coding and technical problem-solving in your domain
-
5Virtual Panel Interview Oppgitt av arbeidsgiverenStructured interview with 2-4 panelists using STAR methodology. Technical and behavioral questions.→ Prepare 8+ STAR stories; ensure flawless video setup; no AI tools during interview
-
6Background Check & Security Clearance Oppgitt av arbeidsgiverenComprehensive background investigation; security clearance process for classified roles→ Be truthful on all forms; understand clearance timeline expectations
Tester og vurderinger
Programming assessment for software and systems engineering roles. Tests algorithmic thinking, code quality, and problem-solving in relevant languages.
Måler: Coding proficiency, algorithmic thinking, problem decomposition, code quality
- Practise problems in languages relevant to the role
- Focus on clean, well-structured code
- Handle edge cases carefully
- Manage time across problems
Vanlige feil
- Not reading requirements carefully
- Ignoring edge cases
- Overcomplicating solutions
Phone or video technical discussion testing domain knowledge, system design thinking, and problem-solving approach.
Måler: Technical depth, system design ability, problem-solving methodology, communication clarity
- Prepare to explain technical concepts clearly
- Show systematic problem-solving approach
- Be ready to discuss past technical projects in detail
- Demonstrate breadth and depth in your domain
Vanlige feil
- Being too vague about technical details
- Not explaining thought process
- Inability to discuss trade-offs
Intervjuer
The core of Lockheed Martin's process. Interviewers are strictly trained to evaluate using STAR methodology (Situation, Task, Action, Result). They actively listen for all four STAR components to score responses. AI transcription bots or meeting assistants are explicitly prohibited.
Format: Virtual or in-person panel with 2-4 interviewers, typically 45-60 minutes
Hva intervjuere ser etter
- Clear STAR structure in every answer
- Specific, authentic examples
- Alignment with Do What's Right, Respect Others, Perform With Excellence
- Technical competence demonstrated through examples
- Integrity and authenticity
Temaer du kan øve på
- Tell me about a complex project you led
- Describe how you resolved a technical challenge
- Give an example of doing the right thing under pressure
- How have you demonstrated excellence in your work?
- Structure EVERY answer as STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result)
- Prepare 8+ stories covering different competencies
- Be authentic - don't fabricate or exaggerate
- Ensure your video/Teams/Zoom setup is flawless
For engineering roles: deeper technical discussion assessing domain expertise, system design thinking, and engineering judgement.
Format: Technical deep-dive with engineering panel, 45-60 minutes
Hva intervjuere ser etter
- Deep domain expertise
- System-level thinking
- Engineering judgement and trade-off analysis
- Innovation and problem-solving
- Clear communication of complex ideas
Temaer du kan øve på
- System architecture decisions
- Technical problem-solving methodology
- Engineering trade-off analysis
- Innovation in constrained environments
- Prepare to discuss past projects at deep technical level
- Show system-level understanding
- Discuss trade-offs and engineering decisions you've made
- Be prepared for whiteboard or diagram-based discussions
Forskjeller mellom stillinger
Finn stillingen som ligner mest på din. Les hva kildene sier, hva som ikke er oppgitt, og våre uavhengige forslag til øving. Bekreft kravene for den aktuelle stillingen med rekruttereren.
Software & Systems Engineering
Tester og vurderinger
- Online coding challenge
- Technical phone interview
- System design discussion
Intervjuer
- Technical panel interview
- STAR behavioral interview
- System design review
Engineering & Technical
Tester og vurderinger
- Technical assessment (domain-specific)
- Problem-solving evaluation
Intervjuer
- Technical panel interview
- STAR behavioral interview
- Design review discussion
Business & Operations
Tester og vurderinger
- Competency evaluation (if applicable)
Intervjuer
- STAR behavioral panel interview
- Competency-based interview
Security-Clearance Roles
Tester og vurderinger
- Technical assessment
- Additional screening
Intervjuer
- STAR panel interview
- Technical depth interview
- Extended background investigation
Velg en øvingspakke for stillingen din
Lockheed Martin employs roughly 120,000 people across Aeronautics, Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space, and most requisitions require US citizenship with security-clearance eligibility. Its funnel is unusually standardized: a Paradox-powered virtual assistant named LEO contacts advancing candidates to book interview slots, and 2-4 person panels score every answer strictly against STAR format under the mottos Do What's Right, Respect Others, Perform With Excellence. That means an F-35 structures engineer in Fort Worth and a cyber defender in Denver face very different technical screens but the same behavioral discipline. Zero in on the family matching your target role, then rehearse its panels and your STAR stories before LEO ever reaches out.
Aeronautics Structures Engineer (F-35 & F-16 Airframe)
Aeronautics EngineeringStructures engineers at Lockheed Martin own stress, loads and fatigue analysis on F-35 and F-16 airframes, working out of the Fort Worth final assembly and production site. The job pairs composite and metallic structural design with daily partnering across materials and processes and manufacturing engineering. Skunk Works in Palmdale runs classified rapid-prototype structures, while damage tolerance and service-life extension studies keep legacy F-16 fleets flying for customers worldwide.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: LEO, the virtual scheduling assistant, contacts advancing candidates to book interview slots before any human contact. Expect a technical phone screen with the hiring manager, then a 45-60 minute virtual panel with 2-4 interviewers scoring strictly against STAR - and AI transcription tools are explicitly prohibited.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Aeronautics panels sketch load paths on the spot and expect you to reason about stress, deflection and margin, which is exactly what the solid-mechanics course and mechanical drills train. Interviewers assume native aerospace vocabulary - load paths, fatigue spectra, composite layup - and the aerospace course supplies it if your background is outside airframes. Spatial practice supports the geometry reasoning behind structural layouts, and numerical speed keeps sizing estimates credible while a panel watches. Senior engineers answer for program cost and review-room judgment, so cost-control content and SJT rehearsal carry those rounds.
Graduate structures screens lean on mechanics coursework and aptitude before portfolio depth - master stress fundamentals and the classic STAR behavioral set first.
Experienced-hire panels dig into analyses you personally owned - fatigue cases, composite decisions and production-support war stories told in strict STAR.
Senior structures roles answer for program cost, technical risk and review-room judgment more than fresh analysis, so the bundle shifts to trade-off drills.
Missiles & Fire Control Electronics Engineer (PAC-3, HIMARS & Precision Fires)
Missiles & Fire ControlMissiles and Fire Control electronics engineers design seeker, guidance and navigation hardware for PAC-3 MSE interceptors and precision-strike weapons such as JASSM and LRASM. Launcher and fire-control hardware for HIMARS and GMLRS is produced largely in Camden, Arkansas, while RF, control actuation and power electronics roles sit mainly at the Dallas and Grand Prairie campuses. A record munitions ramp makes design-for-test and supplier-driven engineering daily realities.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: After a recruiter screen and LEO scheduling, expect a technical deep-dive on circuits, RF or guidance content, then a STAR panel mixing discipline depth with behavioral scoring against the ethics mottos. Security clearance initiation via the SF-86 runs in parallel, and an interim Secret is common before start.
Hvorfor denne pakken: MFC hardware loops probe circuit intuition directly - topologies, derating, protection philosophies - which the circuits course and electrical engineering module rebuild from fundamentals. Seeker and guidance conversations lean hard on signal integrity and EMC vocabulary the electromagnetics course covers. The aerospace module frames the weapon-system context so answers land in mission terms, and numerical practice keeps power and link-budget arithmetic instant. Senior rounds debate failure modes and escalation judgment, where structured critical thinking and SJT rehearsal win points.
Graduate MFC screens stress circuit fundamentals and aptitude before program depth - solid basics plus clean STAR stories decide the outcome.
Mid-level loops assume ownership of real boards and subsystems - derating decisions, EMC fixes and supplier escalations become the center of gravity.
Senior MFC engineers arbitrate architecture, test strategy and program risk - judgment and structured reasoning outweigh fresh calculation work.
Software Engineer (Flight, Ground & Mission Systems)
Software EngineeringLockheed software engineers write embedded flight software in C++ and Ada under DO-178C-style process rigor, build ground stations and mission planning tools, and staff agile software factories in Denver, Orlando and Moorestown alongside systems engineers on combat and radar programs. Enterprise Java and Python tooling supports production, sustainment and the digital thread, and model-based development with Simulink autocode is common on flight-critical components.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Many software requisitions open with a commonly reported online coding challenge before any human interview. That is followed by a technical phone interview on language fundamentals and past projects, then a STAR-scored panel - some teams add a system-design discussion on safety-critical architecture and requirements traceability.
Hvorfor denne pakken: The online challenge and live coding rounds reward timed practice in the two languages Lockheed actually uses - the Python and Java courses with a programming-test drill rebuild that speed. Safety-critical software questions test deductive rigor, boundary thinking and traceability more than clever algorithms, so deductive reasoning practice maps better than more algorithm grinding. SQL appears across sustainment and data-heavy teams. Senior loops shift to architecture risk, GenAI-era tooling questions and cross-program judgment, where risk vocabulary and structured critical thinking decide rounds.
Graduate software pipelines lean on the online coding challenge and fundamentals - language speed and clean deductive answers come before architecture war stories.
Mid-level loops dig into systems you shipped - traceability decisions, defects caught and the design debates behind them, still scored in strict STAR.
Senior software leads answer for architecture risk, tooling strategy and cross-program trade-offs - the bundle shifts toward judgment and risk framing.
Cyber & Information Security Engineer (DoD Missions & Enterprise InfoSec)
Cyber & Information SecurityLockheed Martin's cyber business defends DoD networks and builds offensive and defensive tooling for military customers, while internal InfoSec protects a 120,000-person cleared enterprise across SOC, identity, incident response and supply-chain security. Cyber range, threat intelligence and analysis work sits alongside compliance-driven governance roles. Secret or Top Secret clearance eligibility gates most cyber requisitions.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Expect a recruiter screen, a technical interview across security domains such as network defense, forensics and IAM, then a STAR panel. Security+ and CISSP appear frequently as required or preferred certifications on postings, and background investigation scope - plus polygraph on some programs - drives offer timing.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Lockheed cyber postings name Security+ and CISSP so often that certification-aligned prep is literally interview prep here. Threat-hunting and anomaly-analysis rounds test whether you generalize patterns from sparse indicators, which inductive drills train directly. Python is the working language of tooling teams on both offensive and defensive sides. Senior rounds probe disclosure, containment and insider-risk trade-offs where there is no clean answer - CISM-level program vocabulary and structured judgment practice are what separate credible security leads.
Early cyber pipelines screen certification fundamentals, scripting basics and analytical instinct before mission-specific depth.
Mid-level loops assume real incidents and tooling you owned - domain depth plus certification vocabulary carries the technical panel.
Senior cyber roles are governance and risk roles - the bundle shifts to program leadership and judgment drills over hands-on tooling.
Program Management & Program Planning (F-35, Space & MFC Portfolios)
Program ManagementProgram planners, control account managers and chief-engineer track leads run multi-billion-dollar baselines across the F-35, Space and Missiles and Fire Control portfolios. Earned Value Management under ANSI/EIA-748 is the operating system of every major program review. Daily interfaces span engineering, supply chain, quality, finance and government customers, with DCMA reviews, risk boards and PDR/CDR milestones dominating the calendar.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Structured interviews probe EVM fluency, cross-functional conflict and customer-facing judgment, scored in STAR by panels. Expect questions on recovering slipped baselines and managing underperforming suppliers, and business operations candidates may face a case-style discussion on cost and schedule trade-offs.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Program interviews at Lockheed are EVM conversations - interviewers expect variance, estimate-at-complete and control-account language spoken natively, which the cost-control course supplies directly. PMP maps to the certification many senior postings prefer. Baseline recovery and supplier-underperformance questions are scenario judgment at heart, so SJT rehearsal structures answers panels can score. Numerical speed underlies the case math, and critical thinking keeps trade-off reasoning clean when interviewers challenge assumptions.
Graduate program-track screens test EVM basics, clear communication and structured thinking before any portfolio responsibility.
Mid-level loops dig into baselines you controlled - variance narratives, customer interactions and risk board decisions told with numbers.
Senior program managers answer for portfolio health and customer trust - judgment, risk and leadership stories outweigh fresh EVM mechanics.
Supply Chain & Subcontracts Specialist (Global Supply Chain Operations)
Supply Chain & SubcontractsGlobal Supply Chain Operations buys everything from castings and fasteners to constrained semiconductor stock across a vast supplier base supporting all four business areas. Long-lead procurement against multi-year defense baselines makes dual-sourcing and supplier liquidity core skills, while subcontract administration flows FAR and DFARS clauses downstream and manages supplier quality escalations. The munitions ramp at Missiles and Fire Control makes shortage triage and supplier development daily work.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: After a recruiter screen, interviews mix a sourcing case discussion with STAR behavioral rounds. Expect negotiation and supplier-conflict scenarios scored for structured judgment, and some roles include a spreadsheet-style exercise on inventory coverage or supplier performance data.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Lockheed screens its buyers and subcontract specialists with numbers - coverage, lead times, supplier performance - so the supply-chain module and its interactive courses are the direct preparation. Data-analysis practice underwrites the spreadsheet exercise, and inventory-control depth separates candidates who can reason about buffers from those who just place orders. Business-risk vocabulary sharpens answers on dual-sourcing and geopolitical exposure, and numerical speed keeps negotiation math instant. Senior rounds probe working capital and escalation judgment, where SJT practice structures the no-clean-answer calls.
Graduate supply chain screens test planning aptitude and Excel fluency first - logistics vocabulary gets you past the recruiter, analytics gets you the panel.
Experienced buyer loops dig into commodities you owned - shortage war stories and supplier fixes carry the interview.
Senior supply chain leads answer for supply risk, working capital and supplier strategy - the bundle shifts to risk and judgment work.
Quality Engineer (AS9100, MRB & Supplier Quality)
Quality EngineeringQuality engineers run AS9100-based management systems, first article inspections and nonconformance dispositions on flight hardware across Lockheed sites. Material Review Boards decide use-as-is versus repair versus scrap with engineers and customers at the table. Supplier quality development spans castings, fasteners, electronics and munitions commodities, and DCMA plus customer source inspections are routine gates on deliverable hardware.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Expect a technical interview on quality tools - 8D, root cause and SPC - plus the standard STAR panel. Some requisitions include a data-interpretation exercise on defect or yield trends, and judgment questions on stopping shipment versus meeting a delivery date come up regularly.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Quality loops open with statistics: SPC charts, capability indices and sampling logic, which the statistics module and course cover at exactly the right depth. Root-cause investigation questions are deductive exercises - isolating causes from symptoms under panel pressure - so deductive drills map directly. Mechanical knowledge keeps hardware dispositions credible, and data-analysis practice supports the defect-trend exercise. Senior quality roles answer for escape containment and cost of quality, where SJT rehearsal prevents frozen answers on ship-versus-stop dilemmas.
Graduate quality screens stress tools and statistics fundamentals - SPC basics and clean root-cause logic come before supplier exposure.
Mid-level loops dig into nonconformances you dispositioned and suppliers you developed, with the data exercise deciding close calls.
Senior quality engineers answer for escapes, cost of quality and customer trust - judgment and risk framing outweigh fresh tool mechanics.
Test & Evaluation Engineer (Flight Test & Integration Labs)
Test & EvaluationTest and evaluation engineers fly F-35 and F-16 test missions from sites including Edwards AFB and Fort Worth, and run integration labs, anechoic chambers and hardware-in-the-loop rigs that validate radar, EW and missile seeker performance. Test readiness reviews, instrumentation design and discrepancy reporting structure the daily work, while Space systems environmental test - thermal vacuum and vibration - runs at the Littleton, Colorado facilities.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Expect a technical screen on test design, instrumentation and data reduction, then a STAR panel. Panels probe anomaly investigation stories - what failed, how you isolated it, what changed - and travel requirements plus clearance scope are screened early in the process.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Test loops live on instrumentation and signal content - what the sensors say and why - so the electromagnetics and circuits courses back the radar and EW test conversations directly. Data reduction is the daily skill, and interviewers pose telemetry-reduction exercises that data-analysis practice trains. The aerospace module frames test points, envelopes and margins so answers land in flight-test terms. Senior roles answer for test program cost and risk disposition, where cost-control vocabulary and structured judgment drills carry the panel.
Graduate T&E screens stress instrumentation basics and aptitude - sensors, signals and clean data habits before test-point authority.
Mid-level loops assume test campaigns you ran - anomaly isolation stories and data reduction depth carry the panel.
Senior T&E engineers answer for test program cost, risk disposition and customer sign-off - judgment drills outweigh fresh instrumentation work.
Finance & Business Operations Analyst (Program Finance & FP&A)
Finance & Business OperationsProgram finance analysts at Lockheed own cost accounts, estimates-at-complete and monthly program reviews, while rates and budgets, forecasting and cash management sit with the Bethesda headquarters and site finance teams. Business operations roles blend finance, strategy and program controls on business-area staffs, and EVMS cost data is the raw material for nearly every analysis produced. Internship-to-full-time conversion is a major hiring pipeline.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Expect a recruiter screen plus one or two behavioral and analytical interviews, again in STAR format. EVM and variance-analysis questions get woven into behavioral prompts, so program finance vocabulary and story structure are scored together.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Lockheed finance interviews are program-finance interviews: variance narratives, estimates-at-complete and forecast cadence, which the budgeting and FP&A course covers at exactly the right depth. Accounting fundamentals make EAC conversations credible, and numerical speed underwrites the live estimation tests some panels run. Business operations candidates need markets and risk vocabulary as their roles blend strategy with controls. Verbal practice matters because every finding eventually gets defended to engineers and government customers, and SJT rehearsal structures the escalation calls senior analysts face.
Finance entry screens at Lockheed weigh numeracy, accounting basics and variance analysis together; ratio speed and statement instincts pick the shortlist.
Senior analyst loops center on programs you supported - variance narratives and EAC defense with the data to back them.
Finance managers answer for program health calls and portfolio strategy - judgment and business framing outweigh fresh modeling speed.
Space Systems Engineer (GPS III, Orion & Next Gen OPIR)
Space SystemsThe Littleton, Colorado campus builds GPS III satellites, Orion deep-space capsules and Next Gen OPIR missile-warning constellations, and systems engineers sit at the center of all three. The work spans requirements flow-down, MBSE with Cameo and SysML, integration and test, and constellation-level analysis. Fleet Ballistic Missile work sustains decades-long Navy strategic programs, with thermal, structures, propulsion and avionics discipline engineers all feeding the systems pipeline.
Slik ansetter Lockheed Martin til denne typen stilling: Expect a technical screen on systems fundamentals - requirements, interfaces, margins - then a STAR panel. Some loops include a scenario exercise on anomaly resolution during spacecraft integration, and clearance scope plus ITAR constraints on export-controlled work are flagged early.
Hvorfor denne pakken: Space systems loops test physics and math fundamentals through orbital, thermal and structural content, so the physics and mathematics courses carry the technical base. The aerospace module frames vehicle-level context so your answers land in mission terms rather than component terms. Circuits knowledge supports avionics interface discussions, and numerical speed keeps margin and budget arithmetic instant. Anomaly-resolution scenario exercises reward structured critical thinking, and senior loops shift to program risk and cost disposition where SJT and cost-control vocabulary win rounds.
Graduate space systems screens stress physics and math fundamentals with light scenario work - master the basics before MBSE vocabulary matters.
Mid-level loops dig into requirements and interfaces you owned - flow-down decisions and integration anomalies become the main event.
Senior systems engineers arbitrate margins, risk and cost across vehicles - judgment and program framing outweigh fresh analysis work.
Verdier og rammeverk
Lockheed Martin's mission and culture are anchored by three core values. Interviewers actively look for authenticity, integrity, and structured evidence of these values in practice.
- Do What's Right: Show ethical decision-making, integrity under pressure, and moral courage
- Respect Others: Demonstrate inclusive teamwork, valuing diverse perspectives, and collaborative leadership
- Perform With Excellence: Provide evidence of high standards, mission focus, and exceptional delivery
Forslag til øvingsmoduler
Øvingsplaner
- Identify your stage: technical assessment or panel interview
- If coding: solve 3-5 medium problems in your target language
- Prepare 4 strong STAR stories with clear Situation, Task, Action, Result
- Learn Lockheed Martin values: Do What's Right, Respect Others, Perform With Excellence
- Test your video conferencing setup (camera, mic, lighting, background)
- Confirm you have NO AI transcription or meeting assistant tools active
- Prepare 8 STAR stories covering different competencies and values
- If technical role: practise coding or system design problems daily
- Practise delivering STAR answers within 2-3 minutes each
- Research the specific Lockheed Martin program/division you're applying to
- Conduct a mock panel interview via video
- Verify and perfect your video interview setup
- Build comprehensive library of 10+ STAR stories mapped to all three values
- If technical: daily coding practice and system design preparation
- Multiple mock panel interviews practising STAR structure
- Research Lockheed Martin recent programs, contracts, and mission
- Practise handling unexpected follow-up questions in STAR format
- Study the Lockheed Martin Interview Guide (publicly available)
- Perfect video delivery: eye contact, pace, clarity
- Master STAR format so it becomes natural for every answer
- Comprehensive story bank (12+ stories) covering all competencies
- For technical roles: extensive coding and system design practice
- Multiple full-length mock panel interviews with feedback
- Deep research into Lockheed Martin technology, programs, and strategy
- Practise handling panel dynamics (multiple interviewers)
- Develop natural language connecting experiences to core values
- Build confidence with back-to-back interview stamina
- Review and iterate on weakest areas
- Final video setup check and dry run
Vanlige spørsmål
Kilder og kontrollstatus
3 kilder · 2 fra arbeidsgiveren eller en annen primærutgiver · 1 omtalt, men ikke bekreftet
Se hva hver kilde dekker
- Arbeidsgiverens nettsted Lockheed Martin Hiring Process Primærkilde publisert av arbeidsgiveren
- Arbeidsgiverens nettsted Lockheed Martin Interview Guide Primærkilde publisert av arbeidsgiveren
- Søkernes erfaringer Lockheed Martin Engineering Candidate Insights Oppsummering fra tredjepart – les med forbehold
Hver kilde vurderes for seg. En kilde som ikke kan åpnes, eller som ikke dekker det vi viser til, kan ikke underbygge en opplysning her, uansett hvordan den tidligere var merket.
Slik ble guiden laget
Publisert av Job Tests Portal og satt sammen fra de offentlige kildene ovenfor. Guiden er ikke vurdert av en uavhengig rekrutterings- eller testspesialist. Vi er ikke tilknyttet Lockheed Martin, og de står ikke bak guiden.
Vi viser hvor opplysningene kommer fra, og sier fra når noe ikke kan bekreftes. Ansettelsesprosesser endres og varierer med stilling, land og år. Bruk guiden som et utgangspunkt, og følg alltid informasjonen i invitasjonen din.