Nominal vs. Effective Rates
Why 12% compounded monthly is not really 12%
One card quotes 12% compounded monthly and another quotes 12.5% compounded annually. Which actually costs more?
A quote is not a rate
A nominal annual rate \(i\) compounded \(m\) times per year credits \(i/m\) each sub-period. Because those sub-period credits themselves compound, the true annual growth - the effective annual rate (EAR) - is higher than the quote:
More frequent compounding, higher EAR
For a fixed nominal rate, increasing \(m\) raises the EAR, but with diminishing effect: the jump from annual to monthly is far larger than from monthly to daily. In the limit of continuous compounding the EAR approaches \(e^{i} - 1\).
Never compare two quoted rates directly unless they share a compounding frequency. Convert both to EAR first - that is the only apples-to-apples comparison.
- Inputs: \(i = 0.12\), \(m = 12\), so \(i/m = 0.01\).
- Growth over the year: \((1.01)^{12} = 1.126825\).
- Subtract 1: \(EAR = 1.126825 - 1 = 0.126825\).
💡 Hint
Check your understanding
- A nominal rate needs a compounding frequency to be meaningful.
- The effective annual rate is \(EAR = (1 + i/m)^m - 1\).
- Convert every quote to EAR before comparing borrowing or investing options.
🎓 Go deeper: external courses & trusted references
External sites are listed for reference only. This course is independent and has no affiliation with, or endorsement from, the institutions named.